Prediction of Jerome Kym [132nd] vs Matteo Gigante [200th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W L L L W
Form
L W L W W W L L W LH2H: Kym 1 - 1 Gigante
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kym winning 3 and Gigante winning 2. The last match between Kym and Gigante was at the Villena Challenger, 30-09-2024, First, Hard with Jerome Kym getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jerome Kym | 1 |
| Matteo Gigante | 1 |
| Kym | Stats | Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (2-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (8-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 132 | Ranking | 200 |
| 129 | Highest Rank | 132 |
| 22 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 5 | Titles | 5 |
| 67% (133-65) | Career Total W/L | 58% (150-109) |
| $93,710 | Career Prize Money | $280,090 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Matteo Gigante
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 1-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jerome Kym
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
4
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 26 | Games Won | 18 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:23:22 | Average Match Time | 1:23:22 |
| 63% (87/138) | 1st Serve % | 60% (76/126) |
| 78% (68/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (46/76) |
| 41% (21/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (27/50) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 42% (53/126) | Return Points Win % | 36% (49/138) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jerome Kym vs Matteo Gigante Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kym 1 - 1 Gigante
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kym has won 46.07% of points on their second serve, while Gigante has won 40.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kym, in recent form, has won 42.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gigante has won 49.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.08% and 26.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kym has saved 55.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gigante has saved 48.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kym has won 71.83% of matches played (W/L 51/ 20), with Gigante winning 50.94% (W/L 27/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 32/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 19/ 15). Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 56/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 9/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Kym has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.34% of matches (W/L 34/ 13), where as Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kym winning 1 times and Gigante being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Kym winning 3 and Gigante winning 2. The last match between Kym and Gigante was at the Villena Challenger, 30-09-2024, First, Hard with Jerome Kym getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kym and Gigante have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kym winning 0 times and Gigante 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kym winning 0, and Gigante 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kym has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.87 while Gigante has played against players with an average rank of 228.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kym has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gigante has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kym has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gigante has converted 37.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Jerome Kym
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Jerome Kym
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
110)
5
Aces
19
8
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(0) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jerome Kym
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
13
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Jerome Kym
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sebastian Baez
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Matteo Gigante
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rohan Murali
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Matteo Gigante
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
8
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Kym vs Gigante?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kym Vs Gigante is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (133/65) | Win/Loss | 58% (150/109) |
| 64% (294/162) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (340/266) |
| 55% (2451/1971) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2974/2732) |
| 0.64 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1390 | Aces Total | 810 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 497 | Total Double Faults | 864 |
| 1:43:36 | Average Match Time | 1:33:6 |
| 239.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 280.63 |
| 64% (8521/13393) | 1st Serve % | 59% (10146/17154) |
| 74% (6332/8521) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6914/10146) |
| 50% (2441/4872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3457/7008) |
| 42% (594/1421) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (813/1862) |
| 41% (5743/14162) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7182/17436) |
| 68% (133/196) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (147/251) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 58% (52/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (44/77) |
| 55% (34/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (46/86) |
| 89% (132/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (159/127) |
| 11% (132/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (159/30) |
| 24% (66/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (100/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
